<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding how ASA Firewall matches Tunnel-Group Names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ine.com/2009/04/19/understanding-how-asa-firewall-matches-tunnel-group-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ine.com/2009/04/19/understanding-how-asa-firewall-matches-tunnel-group-names/</link>
	<description>Helping you become a Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:21:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: mirofahmy</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2009/04/19/understanding-how-asa-firewall-matches-tunnel-group-names/#comment-362029</link>
		<dc:creator>mirofahmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=1062#comment-362029</guid>
		<description>Dear Petr

the problem inundrstand the topic
that is not clear where vpn use MAIN mode or aggrisive mode
we need to identify that exactly

with both preshared and certificate 
 we need to final that

second 
that is clear with ASA 
what about normal IOS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Petr</p>
<p>the problem inundrstand the topic<br />
that is not clear where vpn use MAIN mode or aggrisive mode<br />
we need to identify that exactly</p>
<p>with both preshared and certificate<br />
 we need to final that</p>
<p>second<br />
that is clear with ASA<br />
what about normal IOS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahesh</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2009/04/19/understanding-how-asa-firewall-matches-tunnel-group-names/#comment-279159</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 04:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=1062#comment-279159</guid>
		<description>Guys,

Could you please help me on below error:

&quot;Tunnel group search using certificate maps failed for peer certificate&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys,</p>
<p>Could you please help me on below error:</p>
<p>&#8220;Tunnel group search using certificate maps failed for peer certificate&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Miller</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2009/04/19/understanding-how-asa-firewall-matches-tunnel-group-names/#comment-93236</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=1062#comment-93236</guid>
		<description>Fantastic essay, this helped me understand the tunnel-group process well enough to get a mixed static/dynamic tunnel config working on our ASA&#039;s

/wave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic essay, this helped me understand the tunnel-group process well enough to get a mixed static/dynamic tunnel config working on our ASA&#8217;s</p>
<p>/wave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tacack</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2009/04/19/understanding-how-asa-firewall-matches-tunnel-group-names/#comment-73392</link>
		<dc:creator>tacack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=1062#comment-73392</guid>
		<description>Great resource Petr!

This always acts as a quick reference or cheatsheet when i forget about certificates and tunnel-groups!

However, i&#039;d be super glad if you write an article on matching hostnames in aggressive mode? Because i tried labbing that many times and it doesn&#039;t work as expected. 

Just a sample config/explanation would be awesome! :)

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great resource Petr!</p>
<p>This always acts as a quick reference or cheatsheet when i forget about certificates and tunnel-groups!</p>
<p>However, i&#8217;d be super glad if you write an article on matching hostnames in aggressive mode? Because i tried labbing that many times and it doesn&#8217;t work as expected. </p>
<p>Just a sample config/explanation would be awesome! <img src='http://blog.ine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Hare</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2009/04/19/understanding-how-asa-firewall-matches-tunnel-group-names/#comment-57419</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Hare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=1062#comment-57419</guid>
		<description>A great post Petr.

Finally an explanation as to why my custom tunnel groups have not matched and I have had to configure the default group and policy for RAVPN to work.

Stu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great post Petr.</p>
<p>Finally an explanation as to why my custom tunnel groups have not matched and I have had to configure the default group and policy for RAVPN to work.</p>
<p>Stu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Understanding External Easy VPN Authorization - CCIE Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2009/04/19/understanding-how-asa-firewall-matches-tunnel-group-names/#comment-48018</link>
		<dc:creator>Understanding External Easy VPN Authorization - CCIE Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 17:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=1062#comment-48018</guid>
		<description>[...] defined in the system. You may find the description of the procedure used by the ASA firewalls here Understanding how ASA Firewall Matching tunnel-group Names . IOS router use similar procedure, which is somewhat simplified when using just ezVPN clients. As [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] defined in the system. You may find the description of the procedure used by the ASA firewalls here Understanding how ASA Firewall Matching tunnel-group Names . IOS router use similar procedure, which is somewhat simplified when using just ezVPN clients. As [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A hét érdekeségei - April 30, 2009 &#124; xcke's blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2009/04/19/understanding-how-asa-firewall-matches-tunnel-group-names/#comment-44816</link>
		<dc:creator>A hét érdekeségei - April 30, 2009 &#124; xcke's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=1062#comment-44816</guid>
		<description>[...] Understanding how ASA Firewall matches Tunnel-Group Names [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Understanding how ASA Firewall matches Tunnel-Group Names [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piotr Kaluzny</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2009/04/19/understanding-how-asa-firewall-matches-tunnel-group-names/#comment-42817</link>
		<dc:creator>Piotr Kaluzny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=1062#comment-42817</guid>
		<description>Good Day,

I wish you posted this few months ago. It would have saved me few days trying to figure out the differences between src ISAKMP packet IP, IKE_ID, MM with PSK etc... Could not have realized why we can&#039;t match based on IKE_ID in MM with PSK - after all IKE_ID shows in the 4-th packet along with HASH_I. And this is all because of DH which happens before Auth Phase.

By the way, did you find any difference between setting Request ISAKMP profile like in this post and via &quot;set&quot; inside the profile?

Thanks,
Piotr Kaluzny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Day,</p>
<p>I wish you posted this few months ago. It would have saved me few days trying to figure out the differences between src ISAKMP packet IP, IKE_ID, MM with PSK etc&#8230; Could not have realized why we can&#8217;t match based on IKE_ID in MM with PSK &#8211; after all IKE_ID shows in the 4-th packet along with HASH_I. And this is all because of DH which happens before Auth Phase.</p>
<p>By the way, did you find any difference between setting Request ISAKMP profile like in this post and via &#8220;set&#8221; inside the profile?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Piotr Kaluzny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

