<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Private VLANs Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/14/private-vlans-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/14/private-vlans-revisited/</link>
	<description>Helping you become a Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:32:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Laxmi N M</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/14/private-vlans-revisited/#comment-475237</link>
		<dc:creator>Laxmi N M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 10:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=185#comment-475237</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much. It was very helpful indeed. keep it up good work. thanks a ton...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much. It was very helpful indeed. keep it up good work. thanks a ton&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/14/private-vlans-revisited/#comment-439495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=185#comment-439495</guid>
		<description>Awesome article, thank you so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome article, thank you so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/14/private-vlans-revisited/#comment-420712</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=185#comment-420712</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious if anyone can tell me whether or not Private Vlans can be used with Dynamic Arp Inspection.  I have a hosting environment where I would like to use Private Vlans to accomplish what was in this post, but I also would like to be able to not have one host take down another host by duplicating its IP address.  It seems like DAI with arp access-lists will allow me to provide protection.  Can anyone comment on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious if anyone can tell me whether or not Private Vlans can be used with Dynamic Arp Inspection.  I have a hosting environment where I would like to use Private Vlans to accomplish what was in this post, but I also would like to be able to not have one host take down another host by duplicating its IP address.  It seems like DAI with arp access-lists will allow me to provide protection.  Can anyone comment on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zaheer</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/14/private-vlans-revisited/#comment-411139</link>
		<dc:creator>Zaheer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=185#comment-411139</guid>
		<description>Peter,

Thanks very much for the explaination by example and mentioning it&#039;s link in Vol2.

Zaheer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,</p>
<p>Thanks very much for the explaination by example and mentioning it&#8217;s link in Vol2.</p>
<p>Zaheer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Bryson</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/14/private-vlans-revisited/#comment-201924</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Bryson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=185#comment-201924</guid>
		<description>HI Petr
In the example you gave why was it necessary to create a SVI on both switches, would creating a SVI on only one of the switches be enough as a subnet gateway as all the secondary vlans span both switches within the trunk.
Thanks
Gabriel Bryson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Petr<br />
In the example you gave why was it necessary to create a SVI on both switches, would creating a SVI on only one of the switches be enough as a subnet gateway as all the secondary vlans span both switches within the trunk.<br />
Thanks<br />
Gabriel Bryson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamshed Khan Afridi</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/14/private-vlans-revisited/#comment-199704</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamshed Khan Afridi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 06:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=185#comment-199704</guid>
		<description>Really great article for understanding Private VLANS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really great article for understanding Private VLANS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david aladetan</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/14/private-vlans-revisited/#comment-187926</link>
		<dc:creator>david aladetan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 09:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=185#comment-187926</guid>
		<description>this guy (Petr Lapukhov, 4xCCIE/CCDE) is just too much. very impressed with your depth of knowledge and excellent explanations of difficult subject</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this guy (Petr Lapukhov, 4xCCIE/CCDE) is just too much. very impressed with your depth of knowledge and excellent explanations of difficult subject</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CiscoCertified</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/14/private-vlans-revisited/#comment-173124</link>
		<dc:creator>CiscoCertified</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 07:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=185#comment-173124</guid>
		<description>Great man. you are the one   :)

I was having issue with PVLAN &amp; VACL, now I have issue only with VACL. These 2 topics are badly documented in Cisco.com 

is there any plan for similar articles about VACL??

Thanks again :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great man. you are the one   <img src='http://blog.ine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I was having issue with PVLAN &amp; VACL, now I have issue only with VACL. These 2 topics are badly documented in Cisco.com </p>
<p>is there any plan for similar articles about VACL??</p>
<p>Thanks again <img src='http://blog.ine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/14/private-vlans-revisited/#comment-171932</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=185#comment-171932</guid>
		<description>So when you make a sub-vlan of 1034 are you no longer allowed to use vlan 1034 since the way you configure it is the same...  I was thinking for a second that I could use this technology to use this to merge two vlans (like bridge groups).  I want vlan 700 and vlan 10 in my situatoin to be the same vlan on a switch (i am doing some vmware stuff and don&#039;t have 100% control of this association)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when you make a sub-vlan of 1034 are you no longer allowed to use vlan 1034 since the way you configure it is the same&#8230;  I was thinking for a second that I could use this technology to use this to merge two vlans (like bridge groups).  I want vlan 700 and vlan 10 in my situatoin to be the same vlan on a switch (i am doing some vmware stuff and don&#8217;t have 100% control of this association)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recurso de INE en "CCIE en castellano"</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/14/private-vlans-revisited/#comment-171509</link>
		<dc:creator>Recurso de INE en "CCIE en castellano"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=185#comment-171509</guid>
		<description>[...] Understanding Private VLANs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Understanding Private VLANs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

