<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Notes on the 3560 Egress Queuing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/</link>
	<description>Helping you become a Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:21:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tmo</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-94957</link>
		<dc:creator>Tmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-94957</guid>
		<description>Hi Petr

 srr-queue bandwidth limit 20 - does this  do policing or shaping?
Until recently i was pretty sure it does policing, but fallowing a post on some forum someone claims this is command actually does shaping.

Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Petr</p>
<p> srr-queue bandwidth limit 20 &#8211; does this  do policing or shaping?<br />
Until recently i was pretty sure it does policing, but fallowing a post on some forum someone claims this is command actually does shaping.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-86192</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-86192</guid>
		<description>It is excellent article.And the examples is good for me to understand SRR.
thanks you very much again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is excellent article.And the examples is good for me to understand SRR.<br />
thanks you very much again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Didier from  France</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-13922</link>
		<dc:creator>Didier from  France</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-13922</guid>
		<description>Hi Petr,

an another question please
if i enable q1 PQ (30% for example) but if there is no trafic for the PQ;
the bandwidth of other queues q2/q3/q4 is limited at 70% 
or the bandwidth reserved PQ can be used by the others queues?

i think, the answer will be goog for ingress queues too ?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Petr,</p>
<p>an another question please<br />
if i enable q1 PQ (30% for example) but if there is no trafic for the PQ;<br />
the bandwidth of other queues q2/q3/q4 is limited at 70%<br />
or the bandwidth reserved PQ can be used by the others queues?</p>
<p>i think, the answer will be goog for ingress queues too ?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goyheneix Didier  CCIP France</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-13655</link>
		<dc:creator>Goyheneix Didier  CCIP France</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-13655</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the explication &quot;egress queues shared and shaped&quot;.

but for the ingress queues, i don&#039;t understand the notion of 2 queues when there is a priority queue.
Doc Cisco says, by default 90% q2 and 10% q1 whith a priority 10% for q2. 
if q2 is priority with 10%, why q2 is too 10% in the SRR process ?

Thanks you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explication &#8220;egress queues shared and shaped&#8221;.</p>
<p>but for the ingress queues, i don&#8217;t understand the notion of 2 queues when there is a priority queue.<br />
Doc Cisco says, by default 90% q2 and 10% q1 whith a priority 10% for q2.<br />
if q2 is priority with 10%, why q2 is too 10% in the SRR process ?</p>
<p>Thanks you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-9873</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-9873</guid>
		<description>Hobbs: Your router platform could be the culprit. Like you, I got puzzling results at first when I used c3725 Routers. Then when I changed to the older C2600 routers, I was able to reproduce all of Petr&#039;s above scenarios. Also manually set all interfaces to full-duplex, especially when your the router interfaces are Ethernet (i.e have max speed of 10MBps).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hobbs: Your router platform could be the culprit. Like you, I got puzzling results at first when I used c3725 Routers. Then when I changed to the older C2600 routers, I was able to reproduce all of Petr&#8217;s above scenarios. Also manually set all interfaces to full-duplex, especially when your the router interfaces are Ethernet (i.e have max speed of 10MBps).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hobbs</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-9168</link>
		<dc:creator>hobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-9168</guid>
		<description>First, thanks for a wonderful explanation. I have followed this lab, and when I enable priority queuing in your second scenario, I get the same load distribution as in the first scenario. In other words, prec 5 is still being limited. I have verified that cos 5 maps to queue 1. Is there something else I am missing? I made sure to clear stats on R2 before testing. thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, thanks for a wonderful explanation. I have followed this lab, and when I enable priority queuing in your second scenario, I get the same load distribution as in the first scenario. In other words, prec 5 is still being limited. I have verified that cos 5 maps to queue 1. Is there something else I am missing? I made sure to clear stats on R2 before testing. thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SRR bandwidth calculation &#124; David Sudjiman</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-6780</link>
		<dc:creator>SRR bandwidth calculation &#124; David Sudjiman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-6780</guid>
		<description>[...] you read this Quick Notes on the 3560 Egress Queuing  by Petr Lapukhov, this table will complete the picture to show you how calculation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you read this Quick Notes on the 3560 Egress Queuing  by Petr Lapukhov, this table will complete the picture to show you how calculation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-6269</link>
		<dc:creator>Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-6269</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;To: Pavel Stefanov&lt;/i&gt;

Shaping is always active, no matter whether the interface is congested or not. Thus, it performs function similar to egress policing on the older 3550 models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To: Pavel Stefanov</i></p>
<p>Shaping is always active, no matter whether the interface is congested or not. Thus, it performs function similar to egress policing on the older 3550 models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavel Stefanov</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-6190</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel Stefanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-6190</guid>
		<description>Another great article! 

Just a quick question - when there is no congestion present on the interface, the srr-queue bandwidth shaped command would not limit traffic that matches a queue that is shaped, correct? 

Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great article! </p>
<p>Just a quick question &#8211; when there is no congestion present on the interface, the srr-queue bandwidth shaped command would not limit traffic that matches a queue that is shaped, correct? </p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-3721</link>
		<dc:creator>Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/06/26/quick-notes-on-the-3560-egress-queuing/#comment-3721</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;To Jo&lt;/i&gt;

Sort of :) But version 5 diagrams will probably have extra pictures of medieval castles, dragons, knights and fairies :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To Jo</i></p>
<p>Sort of <img src='http://blog.ine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  But version 5 diagrams will probably have extra pictures of medieval castles, dragons, knights and fairies <img src='http://blog.ine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

