<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using NBAR for Application Filtering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/05/08/using-nbar-for-application-filtering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/05/08/using-nbar-for-application-filtering/</link>
	<description>Helping you become a Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dwayne</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/05/08/using-nbar-for-application-filtering/#comment-3460</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/05/08/using-nbar-for-application-filtering/#comment-3460</guid>
		<description>Brian,
Although i don't see any real world use for this could u match a nbar http HOST/URL inbound on an interface in your example.  So could the service policy be 
service policy INOUT drop_yourself.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,<br />
Although i don&#8217;t see any real world use for this could u match a nbar http HOST/URL inbound on an interface in your example.  So could the service policy be<br />
service policy INOUT drop_yourself.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gian Paolo</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/05/08/using-nbar-for-application-filtering/#comment-3198</link>
		<dc:creator>Gian Paolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/05/08/using-nbar-for-application-filtering/#comment-3198</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I've tried this configuration but if I ping the website and cut&#38;paste the address into the browser I can surf youtube well (tested on a C871 with c870-advipservicesk9-mz.124-15.T5.bin).

So it's a good solution for not-so-clever users olny I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I&#8217;ve tried this configuration but if I ping the website and cut&amp;paste the address into the browser I can surf youtube well (tested on a C871 with c870-advipservicesk9-mz.124-15.T5.bin).</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s a good solution for not-so-clever users olny I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
