<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GLBP Explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/</link>
	<description>Helping you become a Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:32:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Diwa</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-406136</link>
		<dc:creator>Diwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 01:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-406136</guid>
		<description>Hi ,

One doubt i want to know how the GLBP knows the load balancing in the weighting , Suppose GLBP configured in 3 routers e.g .
 In R1 weighting configured as 50
 In R2 weighting 30
 In R3 weighting 20
Suppose 100 PC in the network.how the AVG decide to whom need to assign the  vMAC address.
For e.g if first 50 PC will receive vMAC of R1 for the request then 30 receive vMAC of R2 the 20 PC receive vMAC of R3 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ,</p>
<p>One doubt i want to know how the GLBP knows the load balancing in the weighting , Suppose GLBP configured in 3 routers e.g .<br />
 In R1 weighting configured as 50<br />
 In R2 weighting 30<br />
 In R3 weighting 20<br />
Suppose 100 PC in the network.how the AVG decide to whom need to assign the  vMAC address.<br />
For e.g if first 50 PC will receive vMAC of R1 for the request then 30 receive vMAC of R2 the 20 PC receive vMAC of R3 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siddu</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-394282</link>
		<dc:creator>Siddu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 06:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-394282</guid>
		<description>Is Glbp use Per-paket or Per-destination method</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Glbp use Per-paket or Per-destination method</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prasanth</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-372197</link>
		<dc:creator>prasanth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-372197</guid>
		<description>got a god idea about the topic.
thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>got a god idea about the topic.<br />
thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Costa</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-363488</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-363488</guid>
		<description>&quot;Listen&quot; state is related to listen the other AVFs status.

A AVF in listen state will continue to forward packets normally</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Listen&#8221; state is related to listen the other AVFs status.</p>
<p>A AVF in listen state will continue to forward packets normally</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranjan</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-293496</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 06:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-293496</guid>
		<description>Again you proved...:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again you proved&#8230;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: موتور جستجوی تالارگفتمان های فارسی &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gateway Load Balancing Protocol</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-213929</link>
		<dc:creator>موتور جستجوی تالارگفتمان های فارسی &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gateway Load Balancing Protocol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-213929</guid>
		<description>[...] #show glbp #show glbp brief You can download my topolgy and config files here. Read more: Wikipedida , Cisco , INE CCIE Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] #show glbp #show glbp brief You can download my topolgy and config files here. Read more: Wikipedida , Cisco , INE CCIE Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gateway Load Balancing Protocol</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-213923</link>
		<dc:creator>Gateway Load Balancing Protocol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-213923</guid>
		<description>[...] #show glbp brief You can download my topolgy and config files here. Read more: Wikipedida , Cisco , INE CCIE Blog   منبع: www.1cisco.com      I Love Netw0rk ----------------- CCNP CCNA Security MCITP MCSE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] #show glbp brief You can download my topolgy and config files here. Read more: Wikipedida , Cisco , INE CCIE Blog   منبع: <a href="http://www.1cisco.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.1cisco.com</a>      I Love Netw0rk &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; CCNP CCNA Security MCITP MCSE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milk</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-208777</link>
		<dc:creator>milk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-208777</guid>
		<description>@Nizar Makarem

AVG sends ARP reply using virtual MAC of its own as the frame&#039;s source address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nizar Makarem</p>
<p>AVG sends ARP reply using virtual MAC of its own as the frame&#8217;s source address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nizar Makarem</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-189666</link>
		<dc:creator>Nizar Makarem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 06:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-189666</guid>
		<description>Well, actually this is the best explanation I&#039;ve read about GLBP, but my concern is this, think of layer 2:
Imagine you have 4 routers connected to a switch, every router to a different port on the switch, when the AVG responds to ARP requests with the virtual MAC of the AVF, the switch port that is connected to the AVG update its MAC table, and the switch thinks that this MAC address is associated with the port where the ARP response was received, in this case, the port where is connected the AVG, and not where it really is the AVF, it happens beacuse the switches associates the source MAC address of frames with the ports where they are received.
So, what am i missing? How does the AVG do for the switch to  forward frames to ports which AVF are connected to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, actually this is the best explanation I&#8217;ve read about GLBP, but my concern is this, think of layer 2:<br />
Imagine you have 4 routers connected to a switch, every router to a different port on the switch, when the AVG responds to ARP requests with the virtual MAC of the AVF, the switch port that is connected to the AVG update its MAC table, and the switch thinks that this MAC address is associated with the port where the ARP response was received, in this case, the port where is connected the AVG, and not where it really is the AVF, it happens beacuse the switches associates the source MAC address of frames with the ports where they are received.<br />
So, what am i missing? How does the AVG do for the switch to  forward frames to ports which AVF are connected to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recurso de INE en "CCIE en castellano"</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-171518</link>
		<dc:creator>Recurso de INE en "CCIE en castellano"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/2008/04/24/glbp-explained/#comment-171518</guid>
		<description>[...] GLBP Explained [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GLBP Explained [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

