<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OSPF Virtual Links and Max Cost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/04/16/ospf-virtual-links-and-max-cost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/04/16/ospf-virtual-links-and-max-cost/</link>
	<description>Helping you become a Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sesano</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/04/16/ospf-virtual-links-and-max-cost/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>Sesano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/04/16/ospf-virtual-links-and-max-cost/#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>Brian,

The section of RFC 2328 you quoted above says virtual link will be inoperational IF underlying path has cost GREATER THANN hexadecimal 0xffff .

So my question is then is that if cost is set to 0xffff, then at that value, virtual link should still work !

Or am I missing something here ?

Thanks for the post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>The section of RFC 2328 you quoted above says virtual link will be inoperational IF underlying path has cost GREATER THANN hexadecimal 0xffff .</p>
<p>So my question is then is that if cost is set to 0xffff, then at that value, virtual link should still work !</p>
<p>Or am I missing something here ?</p>
<p>Thanks for the post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atif</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/04/16/ospf-virtual-links-and-max-cost/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>Atif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/04/16/ospf-virtual-links-and-max-cost/#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>Thanks! i have faced this problem! i was doing a lab and wanted to create a virtual-link but it was not coming up and i totaly screwed and i end up making a tunnel! After reading ur article , now i realize i configured the aut-cost reference-bandwidth previously. But in my case i don't have any interface with maximum cost, because i can ping the loopback interfaces of both routers from both routers and both routers only had one path to reach each other! Please clarify if i misunderstood ur article ! Thanks again for this information! Atleast , now i know that there was some technical mistake done by me at that time which is kind-a-relief! 

Best regards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! i have faced this problem! i was doing a lab and wanted to create a virtual-link but it was not coming up and i totaly screwed and i end up making a tunnel! After reading ur article , now i realize i configured the aut-cost reference-bandwidth previously. But in my case i don&#8217;t have any interface with maximum cost, because i can ping the loopback interfaces of both routers from both routers and both routers only had one path to reach each other! Please clarify if i misunderstood ur article ! Thanks again for this information! Atleast , now i know that there was some technical mistake done by me at that time which is kind-a-relief! </p>
<p>Best regards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
