<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catalyst QoS: IP Telephony Endpoints</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/26/catalyst-qos-ip-telephony-endpoints/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/26/catalyst-qos-ip-telephony-endpoints/</link>
	<description>Helping you become a Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pushkar Bhatkoti</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/26/catalyst-qos-ip-telephony-endpoints/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>Pushkar Bhatkoti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/26/catalyst-qos-ip-telephony-endpoints/#comment-833</guid>
		<description>Modification: 

Petr can you please comment on if we can use uplink port for marking as Pete said!

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modification: </p>
<p>Petr can you please comment on if we can use uplink port for marking as Pete said!</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pushkar Bhatkoti</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/26/catalyst-qos-ip-telephony-endpoints/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Pushkar Bhatkoti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/26/catalyst-qos-ip-telephony-endpoints/#comment-832</guid>
		<description>Good point pete.
Peter can you please comment on above?

Thanks
BTW, a good short and nice recap of the QoS!
thanks for contribution...

Pushkar Bhatkoti</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point pete.<br />
Peter can you please comment on above?</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
BTW, a good short and nice recap of the QoS!<br />
thanks for contribution&#8230;</p>
<p>Pushkar Bhatkoti</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Cuadro</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/26/catalyst-qos-ip-telephony-endpoints/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Cuadro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/26/catalyst-qos-ip-telephony-endpoints/#comment-570</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post.  Here's the PDF with the 4.1 ports:  http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/port/4_1/41plrev2.pdf

Regrettably, I have not found a working link from the UniverCD to it.  Cisco has been moving stuff off the UniverCD so it is becoming increasingly unreliable.

I'm hoping they'll be more specific than "all control traffic" because if you consult ten different web sites, you'll get eleven different answers as to what represents a comprehensive list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post.  Here&#8217;s the PDF with the 4.1 ports:  <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/port/4_1/41plrev2.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/port/4_1/41plrev2.pdf</a></p>
<p>Regrettably, I have not found a working link from the UniverCD to it.  Cisco has been moving stuff off the UniverCD so it is becoming increasingly unreliable.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping they&#8217;ll be more specific than &#8220;all control traffic&#8221; because if you consult ten different web sites, you&#8217;ll get eleven different answers as to what represents a comprehensive list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/26/catalyst-qos-ip-telephony-endpoints/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/26/catalyst-qos-ip-telephony-endpoints/#comment-525</guid>
		<description>Hi Petr,
Just for the "sake" of CCIE lab, can I just apply the marking acl policy on the switch's uplink port to save some valuable time, instead of applying on each ipphone's port and CallManager's port?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Petr,<br />
Just for the &#8220;sake&#8221; of CCIE lab, can I just apply the marking acl policy on the switch&#8217;s uplink port to save some valuable time, instead of applying on each ipphone&#8217;s port and CallManager&#8217;s port?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/26/catalyst-qos-ip-telephony-endpoints/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/26/catalyst-qos-ip-telephony-endpoints/#comment-509</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;To: Pete&lt;/i&gt;

Sure, using the same techniques as on any switchport. However, an uplink to a router is usually a link towards the network core. Packets that arrive on that link should have been already classified and marked. Therefore, on the uplink ports, QoS marking is usually simply trusted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To: Pete</i></p>
<p>Sure, using the same techniques as on any switchport. However, an uplink to a router is usually a link towards the network core. Packets that arrive on that link should have been already classified and marked. Therefore, on the uplink ports, QoS marking is usually simply trusted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/26/catalyst-qos-ip-telephony-endpoints/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/26/catalyst-qos-ip-telephony-endpoints/#comment-507</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Just wondering, can I do the marking on the uplink port to router?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Just wondering, can I do the marking on the uplink port to router?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
