Comments on: Catalyst QoS: The 3550 Explained http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/ Helping you become a Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:32:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Recurso de INE en "CCIE en castellano" http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-171515 Recurso de INE en "CCIE en castellano" Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:38:53 +0000 http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-171515 [...] Catalyst 3550 QoS Explained [...] [...] Catalyst 3550 QoS Explained [...]

]]> By: Blog Post Catalogue | CCIE Blog http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-139574 Blog Post Catalogue | CCIE Blog Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:56:06 +0000 http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-139574 [...] Catalyst 3550 QoS Explained [...] [...] Catalyst 3550 QoS Explained [...]

]]> By: timaz http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-94065 timaz Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:26:42 +0000 http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-94065 hi. i've got 4*3550 for my lab and can not afford any 3560. are the differences between 3550 and 3560 much more that can affect my lab works? hi. i’ve got 4*3550 for my lab and can not afford any 3560. are the differences between 3550 and 3560 much more that can affect my lab works?

]]> By: Alphacentauro3 http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-86676 Alphacentauro3 Sun, 27 Dec 2009 05:21:38 +0000 http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-86676 Excellent note, the best that I've found. I would like one about switch 3560. Thanks Excellent note, the best that I’ve found.
I would like one about switch 3560.
Thanks

]]> By: Bob http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-71409 Bob Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:47:07 +0000 http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-71409 Spelling error: "Understanding QoS Policing and Marking on the Catalyst 3350" You even got the capitalization right, so didn't you copy the title? :-) Spelling error:
“Understanding QoS Policing and Marking on the Catalyst 3350″

You even got the capitalization right, so didn’t you copy the title? :-)

]]> By: #CCIE hunt / notatki » Blog Archive » catalyst qos http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-56364 #CCIE hunt / notatki » Blog Archive » catalyst qos Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:59:10 +0000 http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-56364 [...] http://blog.ine.com//2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/ Lipiec 9th, 2009   [...] [...] http://blog.ine.com//2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/ Lipiec 9th, 2009   [...]

]]> By: Shoutcast Reseller http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-53926 Shoutcast Reseller Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:50:30 +0000 http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-53926 <strong>Shoutcast Reseller...</strong> Awsome post, i would like to a reference that can help to someone that wants...... Shoutcast Reseller…

Awsome post, i would like to a reference that can help to someone that wants……

]]> By: QoS on Catalyst Switches « CCIE Study Notes http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-47123 QoS on Catalyst Switches « CCIE Study Notes Tue, 12 May 2009 05:58:05 +0000 http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-47123 [...] InternetworkExpert goes into more detail on the 3550 classification system. An incoming frame either contain an IP packet or a non-IP packet. [...] [...] InternetworkExpert goes into more detail on the 3550 classification system. An incoming frame either contain an IP packet or a non-IP packet. [...]

]]> By: Gaurav Madan http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-16448 Gaurav Madan Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:48:14 +0000 http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-16448 Hi Petr I referred the post . I have a query . At ingress of 3550 port ; you mentioned following : Note that you can’t share an aggregate policer among different ports. I dont understand meaning of this statement . I have following : mls qos aggregate-policer TEST1 8000000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit Policy Map AGG Class CL1 police aggregate TEST1 Class CL2 police aggregate TEST1 ! interface FastEthernet1/0/4 service-policy input AGG end Rack1SW1(config)#do sh run int f1/0/5 Building configuration... Current configuration : 88 bytes ! interface FastEthernet1/0/5 service-policy input AGG end What actually was the meaning of statement . Can you please guide . Thnx in advance Gaurav Madan Hi Petr

I referred the post . I have a query .
At ingress of 3550 port ; you mentioned following :

Note that you can’t share an aggregate policer among different ports.

I dont understand meaning of this statement . I have following :

mls qos aggregate-policer TEST1 8000000 8000 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit

Policy Map AGG
Class CL1
police aggregate TEST1
Class CL2
police aggregate TEST1

!
interface FastEthernet1/0/4
service-policy input AGG
end

Rack1SW1(config)#do sh run int f1/0/5
Building configuration…

Current configuration : 88 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet1/0/5
service-policy input AGG
end

What actually was the meaning of statement . Can you please guide .

Thnx in advance
Gaurav Madan

]]> By: Raheel http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-8621 Raheel Fri, 19 Sep 2008 03:33:24 +0000 http://blog.ine.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#comment-8621 Hi Petr, When no CoS value is present in incoming packet and we want to change the default CoS value assigned to a port(1 in this case) then in this case why mls qos trust cos command is required prior to the mls qos cos 1 command what are we trusting in this case? Hi Petr,

When no CoS value is present in incoming packet and we want to change the default CoS value assigned to a port(1 in this case) then in this case why mls qos trust cos command is required prior to the mls qos cos 1 command what are we trusting in this case?

]]>