<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turning Switch into Hub</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/05/turning-switch-into-hub/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/05/turning-switch-into-hub/</link>
	<description>Helping you become a Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/05/turning-switch-into-hub/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/05/turning-switch-into-hub/#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;To: JOHN&lt;/i&gt;

This method would work with any switch supporting RSPAN VLANs. AFAIK 3500XL/2900XL do not support RSPAN functionality, so you won't be able to use this trick there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To: JOHN</i></p>
<p>This method would work with any switch supporting RSPAN VLANs. AFAIK 3500XL/2900XL do not support RSPAN functionality, so you won&#8217;t be able to use this trick there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOHN</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/05/turning-switch-into-hub/#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>JOHN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/05/turning-switch-into-hub/#comment-1143</guid>
		<description>what about the cisco 3500XL layer 2 switch? it is the same configuration i need to perform? I really appreciate if you can answer this for me. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about the cisco 3500XL layer 2 switch? it is the same configuration i need to perform? I really appreciate if you can answer this for me. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/05/turning-switch-into-hub/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/05/turning-switch-into-hub/#comment-227</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; to: dknov &lt;/i&gt;

Well, just as with any "classic" hub, all ports get flooded with frames received on any other ports in the same VLAN. Nice to have, if you like to know what your peers are doing ;) But seriously, the only real benefit is getting rid of mac-address learning and CAM table blowup. This kind of service applies perfectly to "port-to-port" services, where mac-address learning is unnecessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> to: dknov </i></p>
<p>Well, just as with any &#8220;classic&#8221; hub, all ports get flooded with frames received on any other ports in the same VLAN. Nice to have, if you like to know what your peers are doing <img src='http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> But seriously, the only real benefit is getting rid of mac-address learning and CAM table blowup. This kind of service applies perfectly to &#8220;port-to-port&#8221; services, where mac-address learning is unnecessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dknov</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/05/turning-switch-into-hub/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>dknov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/05/turning-switch-into-hub/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Wouldn't that cause constant flooding?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t that cause constant flooding?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CiscoSpot</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/05/turning-switch-into-hub/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>CiscoSpot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 03:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/05/turning-switch-into-hub/#comment-214</guid>
		<description>It's a nice idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a nice idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
