<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do prefix-lists work?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ine.com/2007/12/26/how-do-prefix-lists-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ine.com/2007/12/26/how-do-prefix-lists-work/</link>
	<description>Helping you become a Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:32:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2007/12/26/how-do-prefix-lists-work/#comment-474011</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=9#comment-474011</guid>
		<description>Correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2007/12/26/how-do-prefix-lists-work/#comment-465966</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=9#comment-465966</guid>
		<description>So if I used to do a reverse mask like:  
permit ip 192.168.87.0 0.0.0.3 any

It would now be:
permit 192.168.87.0/30 le 32    ?

thanks,

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if I used to do a reverse mask like:<br />
permit ip 192.168.87.0 0.0.0.3 any</p>
<p>It would now be:<br />
permit 192.168.87.0/30 le 32    ?</p>
<p>thanks,</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumit</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2007/12/26/how-do-prefix-lists-work/#comment-463897</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=9#comment-463897</guid>
		<description>Most concise and informative article ever on prefix-list.
Thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most concise and informative article ever on prefix-list.<br />
Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2007/12/26/how-do-prefix-lists-work/#comment-428365</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=9#comment-428365</guid>
		<description>172.16.1.32/28</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>172.16.1.32/28</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Happy</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2007/12/26/how-do-prefix-lists-work/#comment-428016</link>
		<dc:creator>Happy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 07:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=9#comment-428016</guid>
		<description>What should be the prefix list to permit prefix 172.16.1.32 255.255.255.240 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What should be the prefix list to permit prefix 172.16.1.32 255.255.255.240 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rshah.ec</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2007/12/26/how-do-prefix-lists-work/#comment-384064</link>
		<dc:creator>rshah.ec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=9#comment-384064</guid>
		<description>What does following prefix list mean?

ip prefix-list LIST permit 0.0.0.0/32</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does following prefix list mean?</p>
<p>ip prefix-list LIST permit 0.0.0.0/32</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ciprian</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2007/12/26/how-do-prefix-lists-work/#comment-232083</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciprian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 11:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=9#comment-232083</guid>
		<description>Thank you Brian ! Great explanations !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Brian ! Great explanations !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2007/12/26/how-do-prefix-lists-work/#comment-195117</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=9#comment-195117</guid>
		<description>Prefix-lists, like access-lists, have implicit deny at the end.  If you leave out the second sequence all routes will be denied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prefix-lists, like access-lists, have implicit deny at the end.  If you leave out the second sequence all routes will be denied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2007/12/26/how-do-prefix-lists-work/#comment-194582</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=9#comment-194582</guid>
		<description>Very good article...
I have been going through some sample configuration(given below) where prefix-list has been used to prevent default route out of the interface. My question is do we really need both these prefix-list statements? Can&#039;t we omit the second line in the prefix-list to acheive this purpose?

ip prefix-list NODEF_OUT seq 5 deny 0.0.0.0/0
ip prefix-list NODEF_OUT seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32

router eigrp 10
 network 1.2.3.0 0.0.0.255
  distribute-list prefix NODEF_OUT out Tunnel0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article&#8230;<br />
I have been going through some sample configuration(given below) where prefix-list has been used to prevent default route out of the interface. My question is do we really need both these prefix-list statements? Can&#8217;t we omit the second line in the prefix-list to acheive this purpose?</p>
<p>ip prefix-list NODEF_OUT seq 5 deny 0.0.0.0/0<br />
ip prefix-list NODEF_OUT seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32</p>
<p>router eigrp 10<br />
 network 1.2.3.0 0.0.0.255<br />
  distribute-list prefix NODEF_OUT out Tunnel0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadeem Rafi</title>
		<link>http://blog.ine.com/2007/12/26/how-do-prefix-lists-work/#comment-57848</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadeem Rafi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ine.com/?p=9#comment-57848</guid>
		<description>Quite good and helpful information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite good and helpful information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

